Skip to content

effectcheck

0.7.17Package record

Statistical Consistency Checker for Published Research Results

0packages depend
3Kdownloads / year
86.6%test coverage
13/13flavors OK

Overview

About

A conservative, assumption-aware statistical consistency checker for already-extracted research-results text. Parses test statistics, effect sizes, and confidence intervals across multiple citation styles including American Psychological Association (APA), Harvard, Frontiers, PLOS ONE, Scientific Reports, Nature Human Behaviour, PeerJ, eLife, PNAS, and others. Recomputes effect sizes using all plausible variants when design is ambiguous, and validates internal consistency. Supports t-tests, F-tests/ANOVA, correlations, chi-square, z-tests, regression, and nonparametric tests. Explicitly tracks all assumptions and uncertainty in output. Detects decision errors (significance reversals) similar to 'statcheck'. From v0.4.0 file extraction is no longer part of the package — pair with an external extractor (e.g., 'docpluck' at https://docpluck.app) and pass the resulting text to check_text(). Note: this package is under active development and results should be independently verified. Use is at the sole responsibility of the user. Contributions and verification reports are welcome.

Changes in 0.7.17

Welch t-test effect sizes (changes verdicts on Welch rows with a stated N far above df + 2 only)

  • **A stated sample size that already reproduces the reported d is no longer replaced.** A Welch df only bounds N from below (N >= df + 2), so a stated N far above df + 2 is legitimate when variances and group sizes are unequal. The Welch branch treated any scraped N above 1.5 x (df + 2) as "likely from a different study" and replaced it with a value chosen from the reported d itself. Measured at 0.7.16 on "N = 300 participants ... Welch t(150.2) = 0.24, p = .81, d = X": the correct d = 0.03 (2 x 0.24 / sqrt(300) = 0.028) read NOTE with N back-solved to 256, while d = 0.04 read PASS at a swapped N = 152, so the correct value graded worse than a wrong one and the N a row was checked against depended on the value being checked. The override now fires only when the equal-n d at the stated N misses the reported d by more than the effect-size tolerance and its rounding (the cases it was built for, a global N of 794 or 827 contradicting the reported d, still take it). A kept N is named in assumptions_used. Test: tests/testthat/test-v0717-welch-stated-n-kept.R (watched failing first).
Show all changes in 0.7.17Hide the rest of the changes in 0.7.17
  • **The d tolerance was audited for tiny effects and left unchanged.** d = 0.04 against an equal-n 0.028 still grades PASS, through the same absolute tolerance (0.02) any row with N in its own clause gets. Welch versus pooled-SD conventions and two-decimal rounding spread legitimate printed values over roughly 0.017-0.039 at this t, so a tolerance tight enough to flag 0.04 would flag correct values. At very small d a PASS means "not contradicted", not "verified to two decimals". Cross-checked by a second model (Sonnet, tier 2), which agreed on both points and found three gaps fixed here (no note for a kept N, the g path used the d tolerance, a missing t could error).

From NEWS.md in the release

Install

Health

CRAN checks
13OK
Slowest check: 9.0 min · r-oldrel-macos-x86_64
Status changes
  • OK13 OK2026-08-05
  • NOTE12 OK, 1 NOTE2026-08-01
  • OK12 OK2026-04-25
  • NOTE10 OK, 1 NOTE2026-03-28
  • OK7 OK2026-03-26
Advisories

none known

Documentation

In release 0.7.17
READMEYes · 2,212 wordsVignettesYes · 1 · dynamicNEWSYes · 67% structured · mentions 0.7.17Citation fileNoWebsitenot declared in DESCRIPTION
Help pages
114 (81 internal)includes a package overview page
Examples that run
77%24 run in a plain check · 7 only when donttest examples are enabled (R CMD check --as-cran)
Exported functions with examples
71%
Documented parameters
97%
Return-value docs
100%
Help pages citing references
0%

Downloads

3K
CRAN downloads in the past year
Rank #7,841 · ~8/day · ~253/mo
Daily download trend is not available in this view yet.
48930 days
1.2K90 days
3K1 year
Compare downloads with other packages →
Also on344 r2u1 autocran

Repository

0Stars
0Forks
1Open issues
0Open PRs
0Releases
Last activity 2026-10-08
Responsiveness
How these are sampled
PRs merged (all time)
91%
Median days to close, 50 most recently updated closed issues
not measured
Median days to close, 50 most recently updated closed PRs
not measured

Issues over time

2026-07-07 · 02026-08-27 · 1
PracticesBeta

6 development-tooling and community-health practices detected across 4 families in the upstream repository

Checks run against github.com/giladfeldman/escicheck on 2026-10-18.

Continuous integration (2)
GitHub ActionsR CMD check workflow

The R CMD check workflow runs on Linux

Governance and community (2)
Contributing guideCODEOWNERS
CRAN release process (1)
cran-comments.md
Research and citation (1)
CITATION.cff
How this is detected·Detection ruleset v3 (2026-09-26)
AI coding toolsBeta

This repository shows signs of AI coding tools.

  • Claude Codefirst seen on or before 2026-03-14
    Named in .Rbuildignore: .claude
    Commits: at least 56 crediting it in the message
Models named in its commits
  • Claude Opus 4.656 commits · Mar to Apr 2026
Counts are commits, not lines of code. Commits by a tool's accounts count once across all of its accounts. Commits crediting it are the largest count among its credit lines, a minimum.How this is detected·Detection ruleset v4 (updated 2026-09-27)

Dependencies

Declared dependencies
19 external dependencies (excludes base and recommended)

Installing effectcheck adds 19 packages (11 with compiled code, 18 MB of source tarballs). Heaviest: stringi 11 MB, logger 1.1 MB, vctrs 1.0 MB.

Depends (1)
R >= 4.1.0
Imports (10)
LinkingTo (0)
none
Enhances (0)
none
Reverse dependencies
0direct
0indirect

Nothing depends on this yet.

People & History

People (1)
Author, Maintainer since 0.2.3 (2026)
Releases (2)

Pick two releases to compare their code metrics.

  • 0.7.17Latest
    record
    2026-10-08 · current release · diff ↗ ·
    removed 1 export
    extract_pdf_comprehensive
    ·
    listed once in CRAN's queue
    Seen in one reading of CRAN's incoming queue, at 2026-10-08 14:16 UTC, so it stayed less than the time between readings.
  • R
    R 4.6.0 released · 2026-04-24
  • 0.2.3
    record
    2026-03-25
  • R
    R 4.5.0 released · 2025-04-11
Across CRAN, the median accepted release of the past year spent 23 hours in the queue, 90% under 11 days.How queue time is measured

Package metadata

First published
2026-03-25
Total releases
2 / 1 yrs
License
MIT + file LICENSE OSI
Minimum R
≥ 4.1.0
Download size
712 KB

Cite

Cite this package

Run in R for the authors' preferred citation:

citation("effectcheck")
Feldman, G. (2026). effectcheck: Statistical Consistency Checker for Published Research Results (Version 0.7.17) [Computer software]. https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.effectcheck

This package has no citation file, so citation() returns this entry built from DESCRIPTION.

The repository also keeps a CITATION.cff.

Cite the R Observatory

For a number measured here: a download total, a coverage figure, an archival date.

APA

Balamuta, J. J. (2026). R Observatory: Metrics for effectcheck version 0.7.17 [Data set]. HJJB, LLC. Data release v2026-10-22. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21843040

From data release v2026-10-22, which the citation names so these numbers can be found later. More on citing and the projects behind them.

Report a problem with this page →

Privacy choices

These apply to this browser and are stored on this device only. Nothing about your choice is sent to us.

Read the privacy policy