Skip to content

autoFC

1.0.0.1100

Automatic Toolkit for Construction, Optimization, Scoring and Simulation of Forced-Choice Tests

0packages depend
4.1Kdownloads / year
test coverage
13/13checks pass

Overview

About
Maintained by Mengtong LiFirst published 2021-06-078 releasesCRAN page ↗

Forced-choice (FC) response has gained increasing popularity and interest for its resistance to faking when well-designed (Cao & Drasgow, 2019 doi:10.1037/apl0000414). To established well-designed FC scales, typically each item within a block should measure different trait and have similar level of social desirability (Zhang et al., 2020 doi:10.1177/1094428119836486). Recent study also suggests the importance of high inter-item agreement of social desirability between items within a block (Pavlov et al., 2021 doi:10.31234/osf.io/hmnrc). In addition to this, FC developers may also need to maximize factor loading differences (Brown & Maydeu-Olivares, 2011 doi:10.1177/0013164410375112) or minimize item location differences (Cao & Drasgow, 2019 doi:10.1037/apl0000414) depending on scoring models. Decision of which items should be assigned to the same block, also called as item pairing, is thus critical to the quality of an FC test. Because such pairing process often requires researchers to meet multiple objectives, manual pairing becomes impractical or even not feasible once the number of latent traits and/or number of items per elevates. To address these problems, autoFC is developed as a automatic and efficient tool for facilitating the automatic construction of FC tests (Li et al., 2022 doi:10.1177/01466216211051726), essentially exempting users from the burden of manual item pairing. Given characteristics of each item (and item responses), FC measures can be constructed either automatically based on user-defined pairing criteria and weights, or based on exact specifications of each block (i.e., blueprint; see Li et al., 2025 doi:10.1177/10944281241229784). Users can also generate simulated responses based on the Thurstonian Item Response Theory model (Brown & Maydeu-Olivares, 2011 doi:10.1177/0013164410375112) and predict trait scores of simulated/actual respondents based on an estimated model.

Install

Health

CRAN checks
13OK
Slowest check: 2.6 min · r-oldrel-macos-x86_64
Code health
None
Tests · ratio 0.00
not tracked
Coverage
100%
Documentation · exports
6
Dependencies · direct
Check history
  • OK2026-08-05
    13 OK · 0 NOTE · 0 WARNING · 0 ERROR · 0 FAILURE
  • NOTE2026-08-01
    12 OK · 1 NOTE · 0 WARNING · 0 ERROR · 0 FAILURE
  • OK2026-06-09
    13 OK · 0 NOTE · 0 WARNING · 0 ERROR · 0 FAILURE
  • ERROR2026-06-08
    12 OK · 0 NOTE · 0 WARNING · 1 ERROR · 0 FAILURE
  • OK2026-05-02
    8 OK · 0 NOTE · 0 WARNING · 0 ERROR · 0 FAILURE
Show 2 earlier snapshots
  • ERROR2026-04-30
    7 OK · 0 NOTE · 0 WARNING · 1 ERROR · 0 FAILURE
  • OK2026-03-10
    14 OK · 0 NOTE · 0 WARNING · 0 ERROR · 0 FAILURE

Documentation

Documentation
READMEYes · 806 wordsVignettesYes · dynamicpkgdown siteNoNEWSYes · 67% structuredCode of conductNoContributing guideNo
Examples that run
100%
Documented parameters
99%
Return-value docs
91%
References docs
12%

Downloads

4.1K
CRAN downloads in the past year
Rank #6,507 · ~11/day · ~341/mo
Daily download trend is not available in this view yet.
32730 days
1.2K90 days
4.1K1 year
Compare downloads with other packages →
Also on135 r2u58 autocran

Dependencies

Declared dependencies
7 external dependencies (excludes base and recommended)
Depends (1)
R >= 3.5
LinkingTo (0)
none
Enhances (0)
none
Reverse dependencies
0direct
0indirect

Nothing depends on this yet.

Code & Tests

Datasets

People & History

People (3)
Maintainer (1)
Maintainer, Author
Authors (3)
Maintainer, Author
Author
Package Timeline

8 releases. Pick two to compare their code metrics. R releases are shown for context.

  • 1.0.0.1100Latest
    2026-08-23 · current release · diff ↗
  • 1.0.0.1002
    2026-07-14 · diff ↗
  • 1.0.0.1001
    2026-06-10 · diff ↗
  • 1.0.0.1000
    2026-05-27 · diff ↗
  • 0.2.0.1010
    2026-04-29 · diff ↗
  • unarchivedReturned to CRAN
    2026-04-29
  • R
    R 4.6.0 released · 2026-04-24
  • archivedRemoved from CRAN
    2026-04-10
    requires archived package 'irrCAC'
  • R
    R 4.5.0 released · 2025-04-11
  • 0.2.0.1002
    2025-03-13 · diff ↗
  • R
    R 4.4.0 released · 2024-04-24
  • 0.2.0.1001
    2024-02-17 · diff ↗
  • R
    R 4.3.0 released · 2023-04-21
  • R
    R 4.2.0 released · 2022-04-22
  • 0.1.2
    2021-06-07
  • R
    R 4.1.0 released · 2021-05-18

Package metadata

First published
2021-06-07
Total releases
8 / 5 yrs
License
GPL (>= 3) OSI
Additional repositories
stan-dev.r-universe.dev
Minimum R
≥ 3.5
Bundled data
82 KB / 4 files
Download size
299 KB
Installed size
not tracked yet
With dependencies
not tracked yet

Cite

Cite this package

Run in R for the authors' preferred citation:

citation("autoFC")
Li, M., Sun, T., & Zhang, B. (2026). autoFC: Automatic Toolkit for Construction, Optimization, Scoring and Simulation of Forced-Choice Tests (Version 1.0.0.1100) [Computer software]. https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.autoFC

This is what citation() produces when a package has no citation file of its own. If it prints something else, use that.

Cite the R Observatory

For a number measured here: a download total, a coverage figure, an archival date.

APA

Balamuta, J. J. (2026). R Observatory: Metrics for autoFC version 1.0.0.1100 [Data set]. HJJB, LLC. Data release v2026-08-25. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21843040

From data release v2026-08-25, which the citation names so these numbers can be found later. More on citing and the projects behind them.

Report a problem with this page →

Privacy choices

These apply to this browser and are stored on this device only. Nothing about your choice is sent to us.

Read the privacy policy