Artificial Intelligence Systems and Observer Performance
Overview
Analyzing the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) systems/algorithms characterized by a 'search-and-report' strategy. Historically observer performance has dealt with measuring radiologists' performances in search tasks, e.g., searching for lesions in medical images and reporting them, but the implicit location information has been ignored. The implemented methods apply to analyzing the absolute and relative performances of AI systems, comparing AI performance to a group of human readers or optimizing the reporting threshold of an AI system. In addition to performing historical receiver operating receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis (localization information ignored), the software also performs free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) analysis, where lesion localization information is used. A book using the software has been published: Chakraborty DP: Observer Performance Methods for Diagnostic Imaging - Foundations, Modeling, and Applications with R-Based Examples, Taylor-Francis LLC; 2017: https://www.routledge.com/Observer-Performance-Methods-for-Diagnostic-Imaging-Foundations-Modeling/Chakraborty/p/book/9781482214840. Online updates to this book, which use the software, are at https://dpc10ster.github.io/RJafrocQuickStart/, https://dpc10ster.github.io/RJafrocRocBook/ and at https://dpc10ster.github.io/RJafrocFrocBook/. Supported data collection paradigms are the ROC, FROC and the location ROC (LROC). ROC data consists of single ratings per images, where a rating is the perceived confidence level that the image is that of a diseased patient. An ROC curve is a plot of true positive fraction vs. false positive fraction. FROC data consists of a variable number (zero or more) of mark-rating pairs per image, where a mark is the location of a reported suspicious region and the rating is the confidence level that it is a real lesion. LROC data consists of a rating and a location of the most suspicious region, for every image. Four models of observer performance, and curve-fitting software, are implemented: the binormal model (BM), the contaminated binormal model (CBM), the correlated contaminated binormal model (CORCBM), and the radiological search model (RSM). Unlike the binormal model, CBM, CORCBM and RSM predict 'proper' ROC curves that do not inappropriately cross the chance diagonal. Additionally, RSM parameters are related to search performance (not measured in conventional ROC analysis) and classification performance. Search performance refers to finding lesions, i.e., true positives, while simultaneously not finding false positive locations. Classification performance measures the ability to distinguish between true and false positive locations. Knowing these separate performances allows principled optimization of reader or AI system performance. This package supersedes Windows JAFROC (jackknife alternative FROC) software V4.2.1, https://github.com/dpc10ster/WindowsJafroc. Package functions are organized as follows. Data file related function names are preceded by 'Df', curve fitting functions by 'Fit', included data sets by 'dataset', plotting functions by 'Plot', significance testing functions by 'St', sample size related functions by 'Ss', data simulation functions by 'Simulate' and utility functions by 'Util'. Implemented are figures of merit (FOMs) for quantifying performance and functions for visualizing empirical or fitted operating characteristics: e.g., ROC, FROC, alternative FROC (AFROC) and weighted AFROC (wAFROC) curves. For fully crossed study designs significance testing of reader-averaged FOM differences between modalities is implemented via either Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz or the Obuchowski-Rockette methods. Also implemented is single treatment analysis, which allows comparison of performance of a group of radiologists to a specified value, or comparison of AI to a group of radiologists interpreting the same cases. Crossed-modality analysis is implemented wherein there are two crossed treatment factors and the aim is to determined performance in each treatment factor averaged over all levels of the second factor. Sample size estimation tools are provided for ROC and FROC studies; these use estimates of the relevant variances from a pilot study to predict required numbers of readers and cases in a pivotal study to achieve the desired power. Utility and data file manipulation functions allow data to be read in any of the currently used input formats, including Excel, and the results of the analysis can be viewed in text or Excel output files. The methods are illustrated with several included datasets from the author's collaborations. This update includes improvements to the code, some as a result of user-reported bugs and new feature requests, and others discovered during ongoing testing and code simplification.
---
CRAN submission
- Submitted 11/8/22 1:30 PM
After ggplot2 update
- After
ggplot2update to 3.4.0 - Standardized RSM exported function names:
RSM_LLF,RSM_wLLF,RSM_FPF,RSM_TPF,RSM_NLF. These now match the usage inRJafrocFrocBook - 11/7/22 took out dealing with zeroes in
lesDistrvector, too complex - Wherever
geom_line()occurs, check thatsizeaesthetic is replaced bylinewidth
After Peter's fix to issue #85 due to changes in ggplot object structure 10/25/22
- The fix just checks if object is a ggplot object, not details of the object
- I checked that this works with the new version of
ggplot2installed by the following line devtools::install_github('tidyverse/ggplot2@v3.4.0-rc')
Show all changes in 2.1.2Hide the rest of the changes in 2.1.2
- Ran R CMD check success and merged
developerintomasterbranch
Checking all AUC related Cpp code vs. my R code 10/7/22
- Discovered no need to replace error function with Phi function implementation; this is already done in Cpp code
- Added
UtilAnalyticalAucsRSM_Rfunction which does not use Cpp code - Took out the
tempTestflag inUtilAnalyticalAucsRSM; this uses Cpp - R CMD CHK
```
❯ checking dependencies in R code ... WARNING
'::' or ':::' import not declared from: ‘R’
```
- Why is
y_ROC_FPF_Rgenerating a warning? This function is not called anywhere, so I commented it out; the warning disappears
Work post acceptance of v2.1.1
- universal change:
lambdaPtolambdaandlambdatolambda_i9/19/22 - this corresponds with revised notation in book
PlotRsmOperatingCharacteristicsdepends on RSM parameters, not intrinsic parameters 9/22/22- Removed tests in
test-LROCFomCheck.Rcould not resolve in time 9/22/22 - Set default
lesDistr= 1 inPlotRsmOperatingCharacteristicsas we don't want user to have to input this value when it is not needed for the requested operating characteristic (e.g., FROC or AFROC).
From NEWS.md in the release
Install
Health
NOTERd filesr-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64, r-oldrel-macos-arm64, r-oldrel-macos-x86_64, r-oldrel-windows-x86_64, r-patched-linux-x86_64, r-release-linux-x86_64, r-release-macos-arm64, r-release-macos-x86_64, r-release-windows-x86_64
checkRd: (-1) DfFroc2Roc.Rd:29: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ?
checkRd: (-1) DfFroc2Roc.Rd:30: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ?
checkRd: (-1) DfFroc2Roc.Rd:31: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ?
checkRd: (-1) DfFroc2Roc.Rd:32: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ?
checkRd: (-1) DfFroc2Roc.Rd:33: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ?
checkRd: (-1) DfFroc2Roc.Rd:34: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ?
checkRd: (-1) DfFroc2Roc.Rd:35: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ?
checkRd: (-1) DfFroc2Roc.Rd:36: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ?
checkRd: (-1) PlotRsmOperatingCharacteristics.Rd:75: Lost braces in \itemize; \value handles \item{}{} directly
checkRd: (-1) PlotRsmOperatingCharacteristics.Rd:76: Lost braces in \itemize; \value handles \item{}{} directly
checkRd: (-1) PlotRsmOperatingCharacteristics.Rd:77: Lost braces in \itemize; \value handles \item{}{} directly
checkRd: (-1) PlotRsmOperatingCharacteristics.Rd:78: Lost braces
...[truncated]...
temize; meant \describe ?
checkRd: (-1) datasetROI.Rd:14: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ?
checkRd: (-1) datasetROI.Rd:15: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ?
checkRd: (-1) datasetROI.Rd:16: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ?
checkRd: (-1) datasetROI.Rd:17: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ?
checkRd: (-1) datasetROI.Rd:18: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ?
checkRd: (-1) datasetROI.Rd:19: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ?
checkRd: (-1) datasetROI.Rd:20: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ?
checkRd: (-1) datasetROI.Rd:21: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ?
checkRd: (-1) datasetROI.Rd:22: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ?
checkRd: (-1) datasetROI.Rd:23: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ?
checkRd: (-1) datasetROI.Rd:24: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ?
checkRd: (-1) datasetROI.Rd:25: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ?
checkRd: (-1) datasetROI.Rd:26: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ?- NOTE13 NOTE2026-09-08
- ERROR12 NOTE, 1 ERROR2026-09-07
- NOTE14 NOTE2026-04-22
- ERROR13 NOTE, 1 ERROR2026-04-18
- NOTE14 NOTE2026-03-10
Documentation
- Help pages
- 85includes a package overview page
- Examples that run
- 86%69 run in a plain check · 7 only when donttest examples are enabled (R CMD check --as-cran) · 4 hold no code
- Exported functions with examples
- 95%
- Documented parameters
- 100%
- Return-value docs
- 97%
- Help pages citing references
- 51%
Downloads
Repository
- PRs merged (all time)
- 82%
- Median days to close, 50 most recently updated closed issues
- 2
- Median days to close, 50 most recently updated closed PRs
- 0
Stars over time
Forks over time
Releases over time
Issues over time
PRs over time
7 development-tooling and community-health practices detected across 5 families in the upstream repository
Checks run against github.com/dpc10ster/rjafroc on 2026-10-22.
The R CMD check workflow runs on Linux, macOS and Windows, and on R-devel
GitHub Pages site last deployed 2025-04-20 · The repository has a site deploy workflow
Show all practicesHide 1 practice
Dependencies
Code & Tests
Datasets
People & History
Previously maintained by Xuetong Zhai (0.0.1 to 0.1.1).
Show 3 peopleHide 3 people
Pick two releases to compare their code metrics.
- RR 4.6.0 released · 2026-04-24
- RR 4.5.0 released · 2025-04-11
- RR 4.4.0 released · 2024-04-24
- RR 4.3.0 released · 2023-04-21
- 2.1.2Latest2022-11-08 · current release · diff ↗ ·
removed 9 exports
DfReadLrocDataFile, RSM_erf, RSM_xFROC, RSM_yFROC, UtilIntrinsic2PhysicalRSM, UtilPhysical2IntrinsicRSM, funs, prod1, sum1added 5 exports
RSM_LLF, RSM_NLF, RSM_wLLF, UtilIntrinsic2RSM, UtilRSM2Intrinsic - 2.1.12022-08-12 · diff ↗
- 2.1.02022-07-24 · diff ↗ ·
removed 3 exports
Compare3ProperRocFits, UtilLesionDistr, UtilLesionWeightsDistradded 15 exports
DfReadLrocDataFile, DfWriteExcelDataFile, RSM_erf, RSM_pdfD, RSM_pdfN, RSM_xFROC, RSM_xROC, RSM_yFROC, RSM_yROC, UtilLesionDistrVector, UtilLesionWeightsMatrixDataset, UtilLesionWeightsMatrixLesDistr, funs, prod1, sum1 - RR 4.2.0 released · 2022-04-22
- RR 4.1.0 released · 2021-05-18
- 2.0.12020-12-15 · diff ↗ ·
removed 10 exports
DfFroc2Afroc, DfReadLrocDataFile, FitCorCbmRoc, SsPowerGivenJKDbmVarComp, SsPowerGivenJKOrVarComp, StSignificanceTestingCadVsRadiologists, StSignificanceTestingSingleFixedFactor, StSingleTreatmentRandomReader, UtilAucsRSM, UtilVarComponentsORadded 12 exports
ChisqrGoodnessOfFit, FitCorCbm, SimulateFrocFromLrocDataset, SsPowerGivenJKDbmVarCom, SsPowerGivenJKOrVarCom, StSignificanceTestingCadVsRad, UtilAnalyticalAucsRSM, UtilDBM2ORVarCom, UtilOR2DBMVarCom, UtilORVarComponentsFactorial, isBinnedDataset, isValidDataset - RR 4.0.0 released · 2020-04-24
- 1.3.2
- 1.3.12020-01-14 · diff ↗ ·
removed 2 exports
UtilLesionDistribution, UtilLesionWeightsadded 11 exports
DfFroc2Lroc, DfLroc2Froc, SimulateLrocDataset, SsFrocNhRsmModel, SsPowerGivenJKDbmVarComp, SsPowerGivenJKOrVarComp, StSingleTreatmentRandomReader, UtilLesionDistr, UtilLesionWeightsDistr, UtilVarComponentsDBM, UtilVarComponentsOR - unarchivedReturned to CRAN2019-07-31
- 1.2.02019-07-31 · diff ↗
- RR 3.6.0 released · 2019-04-26
Show 12 earlier eventsHide 12 earlier events
- archivedRemoved from CRAN2019-01-17installation errors were not corrected With C++11 on Solaris, as needed for R-devel
- 1.1.02018-11-14 · diff ↗ ·
removed 1 export
ExampleCompare3ProperRocFitsadded 5 exports
Compare3ProperRocFits, DfCreateCorCbmDataset, DfExtractCorCbmDataset, FitCorCbm, SimulateCorCbmDataset - 1.0.2
- RR 3.5.0 released · 2018-04-23
- 1.0.12018-02-18 · diff ↗
- 1.0.02018-02-04 · diff ↗ ·
removed 12 exports
DBMHAnalysis, EmpiricalOpCharac, FROC2HrROC, FigureOfMerit, ORHAnalysis, OutputReport, PowerGivenJK, PowerTable, RJafrocGui, ReadDataFile, SampleSizeGivenJ, SaveDataFileadded 40 exports
Df2RJafrocDataset, DfBinDataset, DfExtractDataset, DfFroc2Afroc, DfFroc2Roc, DfLroc2Roc, DfReadCrossedModalities, DfReadDataFile, DfReadLrocDataFile, DfSaveDataFile, ExampleCompare3ProperRocFits, FitBinormalRoc, FitCbmRoc, FitRsmRoc, PlotBinormalFit, PlotCbmFit, PlotEmpiricalOperatingCharacteristics, PlotRsmOperatingCharacteristics, SimulateFrocDataset, SimulateRocDataset, SsFROCPowerGivenJK, SsPowerGivenJK, SsPowerTable, SsSampleSizeKGivenJ, StSignificanceTesting, StSignificanceTestingCadVsRadiologists, StSignificanceTestingCrossedModalities, StSignificanceTestingSingleFixedFactor, UtilAucBinormal, UtilAucCBM and 10 more - RR 3.4.0 released · 2017-04-21
- RR 3.3.0 released · 2016-05-03
- 0.1.12015-08-14 · diff ↗
- 0.1.0
- 0.0.12015-04-24
- RR 3.2.0 released · 2015-04-16
Package metadata
- First published
- 2015-04-24
- Total releases
- 14 / 11 yrs
- License
- GPL-3 OSI
- Minimum R
- ≥ 3.5.0
- Bundled data
- 124 KB / 23 files
- Download size
- 3.6 MB
Cite
Cite this package
Run in R for the authors' preferred citation:
citation("RJafroc")This package has no citation file, so citation() returns this entry built from DESCRIPTION.
Cite the R Observatory
For a number measured here: a download total, a coverage figure, an archival date.
From data release v2026-10-23, which the citation names so these numbers can be found later. More on citing and the projects behind them.